User Satisfaction Survey on the Korean Patent Abstracts (KPA)

Thank you for using the Korean Patent Abstracts (KPA).
Please take a few minutes to fill out the user satisfaction survey on the Korean Patent Abstracts (KPA)
for further improvement of the quality of KPA.
Your answers will be kept confidential.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Questionnaire

Nationality*

Organization*

Department*
1. [Quality] How satisfied are you with the quality of KPA?
Very satisfied     Somewhat satisfied    Neutral       Somewhat dissatisfied    Very dissatisfied 
2. [Content] How satisfied are you with the content of KPA?
Very satisfied     Somewhat satisfied    Neutral       Somewhat dissatisfied    Very dissatisfied
3. [Word] How satisfied are you with the technical word and grammar suitability of KPA?
Very satisfied     Somewhat satisfied    Neutral       Somewhat dissatisfied    Very dissatisfied
4. [Accuracy] How satisfied are you with data accuracy on KPA?
Very satisfied     Somewhat satisfied    Neutral       Somewhat dissatisfied    Very dissatisfied
5. What is the main purpose of using KPA? (multiple responses)
① Searching prior art and examining patent
② Understanding the trend of Korea patents and technologies for research
③ Discovering ideas
④ Other
6. What do you think is the most important element of KPA? (multiple responses)
① Including the core technical information of the invention
② Delivering the content of the original abstract of the patent gazette
③ Using precise technical terms
④ Using accurate English grammar and spelling
⑤ Readability
⑥ Other
7. Which system do you usually use to access KPA other than K-PION? (multiple responses)
① Free patent search systems provided by KIPO (KIPRIS)
② Free patent search systems provided by the other national or international offices (Espacenet, Patentscope, J-PlatPat, etc.)
③ Commercial patent search systems provided by IP enterprises (DWPI, etc)
④ Other
8. Do you have any other suggestions or comments on KPA or KPA search system in KIPRIS?